Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Washington: In yet one more twist on the BBC documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the 2002 Gujarat riots, the US mentioned it ‘did not learn about him’ whereas reiterating it did not know than the values ​​shared with India. . US State Department spokesman Ned Price mentioned in an announcement: “Washington shares an ‘unusually deep partnership’ with New Delhi, based on values ​​shared by American and Indian democracies.”

Asked by a Pakistani journalist in regards to the BBC documentary, Price mentioned: “I do not know the (BBC) documentary (in regards to the 2002 Gujarat riots) you’re referring to. I do know very properly the widespread values ​​that unite the United States and India as two thriving and vibrant democracies. Price additional mentioned there are numerous parts that strengthen the United States’ international strategic partnership with India, which incorporates political, financial and exceptionally deep people-to-people ties.

Calling India’s democracy vibrant, Price mentioned “we look to all that binds us, and we seek to strengthen all those things that bind us together,” whereas stressing the diplomatic ties that the United States and India share between them. .

The BBC documentary about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the 2002 Gujarat riots has sparked controversy since its launch. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak final week defended Prime Minister Narendra Modi and distanced himself from the BBC documentary sequence, saying he “did not agree with the characterization” of his Indian counterpart.

Sunak made the remarks on the controversial documentary which was raised within the British Parliament by Pakistani-born MP Imran Hussain. “The UK Government’s place on that is clear and lengthy standing and has not modified, of course we don’t condone persecution the place it seems anyplace however I’m not certain I’m of the completely agree with the characterization the honorable gentleman has put ahead,” Sunak mentioned when answering Hussain’s query in regards to the BBC report.

BBC documentary line: How did all of it begin?

UK nationwide broadcaster BBC aired a two-part sequence attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tenure as chief minister of Gujarat throughout the Gujarat riots in 2002. The documentary sparked outrage and was faraway from some platforms . The Department of External Affairs responded to the BBC article saying it was fully biased. Speaking to a weekly presser in New Delhi, MEA spokesman Arindam Bagchi mentioned: “We believe this is a propaganda article. It has no objectivity. is biased. Note that this was not screened in India. We don’t want to respond further on this so it doesn’t get much dignity.”

He even raised questions on “the purpose of the exercise and the agenda behind it.” The documentary is a mirrored image of the company and the people who peddle this narrative once more. This leads us to query the aim of the train and the agenda behind it; frankly, we don’t want to honor these efforts,” he added.

Referring to obvious remarks made by former UK secretary Jack Straw within the documentary sequence, Bagchi mentioned: “He (Jack Straw) appears to be referring to an inner UK report. How do I get entry to it? It’s a 20 12 months previous report. Why would we leap on it now? Just as a result of Jack Straw says so, how do they provide it a lot legitimacy.

Back residence, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju known as the BBC documentary a “malicious campaign” and mentioned such issues couldn’t tarnish India’s international picture.

The Center final week denounced the BBC’s controversial documentary sequence on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing it as a “piece of propaganda” designed to convey a discredited narrative. The Center additionally directed social media platforms Twitter and YouTube to dam hyperlinks to the documentary titled ‘India: The Modi Question’.

The authorities has requested YouTube and Twitter to take away new hyperlinks to the documentary if anybody uploads or re-tweets them, sources mentioned. However, opposition events opposed the transfer and claimed the documentary had “exposed” Prime Minister Modi. A Supreme Court-mandated inquiry discovered no proof of wrongdoing by Prime Minister Modi, who was chief minister of Gujarat when the riots broke out in February 2002.

(With contributions from the company)



Source link