Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

New Delhi:: Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi has expressed her anger over the most recent statements made by the lawyer of Air India pee accused Shankar Mishra in court docket. In a surprising flip of occasions, Mishra has now denied ‘peeing’ on the girl and stated she ‘peed’ on herself. Her lawyer argued in a Delhi court docket on Friday that the girl was a kathak dancer who had an issue with “incontinence” or a scarcity of voluntary management over urination.

Shankar Mishra’s big U-turn within the matter of urination

“The complainant’s seat was locked. It was not doable for him (Mishra) to go there. The girl has an issue with incontinence. She urinated on herself. She is a kathak dancer, 80% of kathak dancers have this downside,” the legal professional stated.

The Shiv Sena MP shared her views on the identical and referred to as Mishra and her lawyer “perverts”. She wrote on Twitter, “He (Shankar Mishra) is truly a pervert, as is his legal team.”

What Shankar Mishra’s lawyer stated in court docket

Shankar Mishra, who faces costs of urinating on a lady on an Air India flight from New York to New Delhi, has denied the allegations and urged the complainant could have urinated in her personal seat.

To read also: ‘The woman peed on her seat…’. Shankar Mishra, accused of Air India ‘peegate’, told Delhi court

In court docket, her lawyer raised questions concerning the police investigation and stated: “The seating system was such that no one could get to their seat. The passenger sitting behind the complainant made no such complaint. ” The legal professional additionally argued that another person could have been chargeable for the alleged incident.

Know the Air India Pee Incident

Shankar Mishra, was apprehended by Delhi Police in Bangalore on January 6, accused of urinating on a 70-year-old girl whereas intoxicated on an Air India flight on November 26, 2022. A criticism was filed by the girl to Air India, prompting Delhi police to file an FIR in opposition to him on January 4. The costs in opposition to him embody sections 354, 509 and 510 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and part 23 of the Indian Aircraft Act. Mishra and the sufferer are not from Delhi. Mishra was additionally fired from his job with monetary companies firm Wells Fargo following the incident.



Source link